Of course, this Cubs group has yet to win another championship. Joe Maddon has not had his contract renewed. Trade rumors have been swarming around the likes of Kris Bryant and Kyle Schwarber following reports of the Ricketts wanting to cut payroll. How do the Cubs pivot after this lost season? How much longer does Theo Epstein have to turn this ship around? These are the existential questions being asked in and around Wrigleyville after this season's second half collapse.
However, I would argue these questions are not totally fair. This Cubs core of Rizzo, Bryant, Baez, and Lester has led the Cubs to post one of the best five year runs in the National League since the inception of the wild card in 1994. The Cubs were swept in the NLCS in 2015 at the hands of the Mets, won the World Series in 2016, lost the NLCS in 5 games to the Dodgers, lost in the wild card game to the Rockies in 2018, and missed the playoffs this year. Those regular seasons, in order, consisted of 97 wins (as I mentioned above), 103 wins, 92 wins, 95 wins, and just 84 wins this past season. Just looking at the playoff and regular season results, this does not scream completely dominant stretch of baseball.
Looking at wins and losses can be misleading. Team strength is dictated by how much you outscore the other team by. For example, take the 2013 Orioles. They won 93 games and reached the playoffs but only outscored their opponents by 7 runs over the 162 game season (or .043 runs per game). The 93 wins came from going 29-9 in one run games which, for the purpose of determining team strength, is relatively meaningless. I would argue this Baltimore group was more average than playoff-caliber. Obviously looking at raw run differential fails to account for run expectancy and hit clustering luck but we do not have team clustering data readily available going back through the channels of baseball history. So run differential is the best tool we have on hand to evaluate team strength throughout baseball history.
I wanted to see how this stretch of Cubs baseball compared to all other five year stretches by every National League from 1994 through this season (I chose 1994 because that was the start of the modern playoff structure). The following plot shows the distribution of 5 year run differentials:
The red line represents the Cubs run differential from 2015 through 2019, which was 662 runs. This was one of the top figures over any five year stretch for any National League club. The following scatter plot highlights the only clubs who outscored their opponents more than the Cubs during this most recent 5 year window:
The only groups that outperformed the 2015-2019 Cubs was every five year stretch from the Braves starting in 1994 through the time period starting in 1998 (with teams headlined by the vaunted trio of Maddux, Glavine, and Smoltz), the 2001-2005 Cardinals, and the 2015-2019 Dodgers. The 2000-2004 Cardinals and 2014-2018 Dodgers were just behind this Cubs group. These teams, not including the Cubs combined for six NL pennants, 1 World Series win, and 13 NLCS appearances. Given the quality of these teams, one might expect these teams to have collected more than just two World Series trophies (three if you include the Cubs).
This discrepancy in results versus expectations can be attributed to the randomness associated with playoffs. A five or seven game series is not enough games to determine the better team. The Cubs have put together one of the most dominant stretches of regular season baseball in the last five years. Even this year, a disappointing campaign, the Cubs outscored opponents by 97 runs. They have just as much hardware to show for as any of the other great National League teams in the wild card era. All of the hand-wringing over the Cubs their future is overblown. They largely return the same group of players. Whoever replaces Joe Maddon is going to have a great group of players on hand. Despite the 84 wins, the Cubs should still be the National League Central favorites going into next year. Save your Cubs obituaries for the future.
data via Baseball Reference
This post appeared on the FanGraphs community form